Spotting Pseudoscience and Media Distortion
A practical field kit of checks for evaluating science claims in headlines, ads, and social feeds.
Keyboard Shortcuts
💡 Pro tip: Use keyboard shortcuts for faster studying!
Study Smart Tips for Spotting Pseudoscience and Media Distortion
Master these concepts using proven study techniques that actually work:
Active Recall
Test yourself before flipping each card to strengthen memory retention
Spaced Repetition
Review difficult cards more frequently than easy ones
Multiple Sessions
Break study time into shorter, focused sessions
Explain Aloud
Verbalize answers to reinforce understanding
Questions Covered in This Set
10 cards to master
What is the 'distortion pipeline'?
The chain from lab → press office → wire service → aggregator → ad, where each retelling strips caveats until a technically-sourced claim becomes false.
First question to ask of any health headline: who was the subject?
Cells in a dish, mice, or humans? In vitro and animal results rarely transfer — bleach kills cancer cells in a petri dish too.
Why insist on absolute risk rather than relative risk?
'Doubles your risk' can mean 1 in 10,000 rising to 2 in 10,000 — a tiny real change dressed up as alarming.
What is the single most common distortion in science media?
A verb upgrade: 'linked to' in the paper becomes 'causes' in the headline, even though the study was observational.
Why is a press conference held before publication a warning sign?
It means the claim hasn't passed peer review or been made available for scrutiny — publicity is substituting for evidence.
What does unfalsifiability look like in practice?
The claim is arranged so no observation could count against it, e.g. 'the skeptic's negative energy interfered' when a test fails.
How did general relativity show falsifiability?
Einstein predicted a specific starlight deflection measurable during the 1919 eclipse — a number that could have killed the theory.
What is 'stagnation' as a pseudoscience tell?
Real fields revise themselves; astrology's twelve signs are unchanged since antiquity while astronomy has rewritten itself repeatedly since 1900.
What is 'conspiracy as immune system'?
Explaining rejection as establishment suppression rather than insufficient evidence, making the claim unkillable and therefore uninformative.
What is 'vocabulary cosplay'?
Using words like quantum, frequency, vibrational, or toxins with no stated mechanism, quantity, or way to measure the effect.
